↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The epidemiology of premature aging and associated comorbidities

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
The epidemiology of premature aging and associated comorbidities
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s37213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Coppedè

Abstract

Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome and Werner syndrome, also known as childhood- and adulthood-progeria, respectively, represent two of the best characterized human progeroid diseases with clinical features mimicking physiological aging at an early age. The discovery of their genetic basis has led to the identification of several gene mutations leading to a spectrum of progeroid phenotypes ranging from moderate and mild-severe to very aggressive forms. In parallel, the creation of disease registers and databases provided available data for the design of relatively large-scale epidemiological studies, thereby allowing a better understanding of the nature and frequency of the premature aging-associated signs and symptoms. The aim of this article is to review the most recent findings concerning the epidemiology of premature aging disorders, their genetic basis, and the most recent reports on the frequency of associated diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Computer Science 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,685,053
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#277
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,299
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.