Title |
Development of a novel disposable lid speculum with a drape
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s45132 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Toru Urano, Masataka Kasaoka, Ryoji Yamakawa, YukihikoTamai, Shoichiro Nakamura |
Abstract |
To evaluate the clinical use of a newly-developed disposable lid speculum with a drape. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 50% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,551
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,081
of 210,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#47
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.