| Title |
Pediatric cataract: challenges and future directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s59009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anagha Medsinge, Ken K Nischal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 77 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 85 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#491
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,044
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.