↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ibrutinib: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Core Evidence, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
31 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Ibrutinib: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Published in
Core Evidence, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/ce.s34068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio C Chavez, Eva Sahakian, Javier Pinilla-Ibarz

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a heterogeneous disease with a variable course, and remains an incurable disease. Frequent relapses and eventual resistance to fludarabine characterize symptomatic CLL and portends a dismal prognosis for patients. Growing evidence has shown that signaling pathways such as the B cell receptor and NFkB are implicated in the survival and proliferation of the CLL cells which are ultimately associated with persistence of the disease. The Bruton's tyrosine kinase pathway regulates downstream activation of the B cell receptor and has emerged as an attractive target. Ibrutinib inhibits the Bruton's tyrosine kinase pathway, and consequently induces apoptosis of B cells. Phase I and II studies have shown impressive response rates with an excellent safety profile in patients with refractory/relapsed CLL and elderly treatment-naïve CLL patients. This paper reviews the preclinical and clinical data for ibrutinib when used in the treatment of CLL. Recent studies showing the benefit of combination therapy using ibrutinib, monoclonal antibodies, and chemoimmunotherapy are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Other 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Chemistry 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Core Evidence
#26
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,748
of 204,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Core Evidence
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.