↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Development and initial validation of a computer-administered health literacy assessment in Spanish and English: FLIGHT/VIDAS

Overview of attention for article published in Patient related outcome measures, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Development and initial validation of a computer-administered health literacy assessment in Spanish and English: FLIGHT/VIDAS
Published in
Patient related outcome measures, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/prom.s48384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond L Ownby, Amarilis Acevedo, Drenna Waldrop-Valverde, Robin J Jacobs, Joshua Caballero, Rosemary Davenport, Ana-Maria Homs, Sara J Czaja, David Loewenstein

Abstract

Current measures of health literacy have been criticized on a number of grounds, including use of a limited range of content, development on small and atypical patient groups, and poor psychometric characteristics. In this paper, we report the development and preliminary validation of a new computer-administered and -scored health literacy measure addressing these limitations. Items in the measure reflect a wide range of content related to health promotion and maintenance as well as care for diseases. The development process has focused on creating a measure that will be useful in both Spanish and English, while not requiring substantial time for clinician training and individual administration and scoring. The items incorporate several formats, including questions based on brief videos, which allow for the assessment of listening comprehension and the skills related to obtaining information on the Internet. In this paper, we report the interim analyses detailing the initial development and pilot testing of the items (phase 1 of the project) in groups of Spanish and English speakers. We then describe phase 2, which included a second round of testing of the items, in new groups of Spanish and English speakers, and evaluation of the new measure's reliability and validity in relation to other measures. Data are presented that show that four scales (general health literacy, numeracy, conceptual knowledge, and listening comprehension), developed through a process of item and factor analyses, have significant relations to existing measures of health literacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Psychology 6 14%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,492,145
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#68
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,982
of 210,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them