↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

RNAi for contactin 2 inhibits proliferation of U87-glioma stem cells by downregulating AICD, EGFR, and HES1

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
RNAi for contactin 2 inhibits proliferation of U87-glioma stem cells by downregulating AICD, EGFR, and HES1
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, February 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s113390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Guo, Peidong Zhang, Hongtian Zhang, Peng Zhang, Ruxiang Xu

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common form of malignant brain tumors and has a poor prognosis. Glioma stem cells (GSCs) are thought to be responsible for the aberrant proliferation and invasion. Targeting the signaling pathways that promote proliferation in GSCs is one of the strategies for glioma treatment. In this study, we found increased expression of contactin 2 (CNTN2) and amyloid β precursor protein (APP) in U87-derived GSCs (U87-GSCs). RNA interference (RNAi) for CNTN2 downregulated the expression of APP intracellular domain (AICD), which is the proteolytic product of APP. Treatment with CNTN2 RNAi inhibited the proliferation of U87-GSCs. CNTN2 RNAi decreased the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and HES1, which are potential targets of AICD. In summary, inhibition of the CNTN2/APP signaling pathway may repress the proliferation in U87-GSCs via downregulating the expression of HES1 and epidermal growth factor receptor. CNTN2/APP/AICD signaling pathway plays an important role in U87 glial tumorigenesis. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the role of these signaling pathways in other sources of GSCs. Depending on their role in proliferation in other sources of GSCs, members of the CNTN2/APP/AICD signaling pathway may provide novel targets for the development of therapy for glioblastomas.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Neuroscience 3 20%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,837,286
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#218
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,476
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#9
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.