↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Immunocytokines: a review of molecules in clinical development for cancer therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 179)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
17 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Immunocytokines: a review of molecules in clinical development for cancer therapy
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s49231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas List, Dario Neri

Abstract

The concept of therapeutically enhancing the immune system's responsiveness to tumors is long standing. Several cytokines have been investigated in clinical trials for their therapeutic activity in cancer patients. However, substantial side effects and unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties have been a major drawback hampering the administration of therapeutically relevant doses. The use of recombinant antibody-cytokine fusion proteins promises to significantly enhance the therapeutic index of cytokines by targeting them to the site of disease. This review aims to provide a concise and complete overview of the preclinical data and clinical results currently available for all immunocytokines having reached clinical development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 20 14%
Other 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Chemistry 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,274,808
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#28
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,188
of 210,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.