↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells in neurological disease modeling: the importance of nonhuman primate models

Overview of attention for article published in Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells in neurological disease modeling: the importance of nonhuman primate models
Published in
Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/sccaa.s34798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhifang Qiu, Steven L Farnsworth, Anuja Mishra, Peter J Hornsby

Abstract

The development of the technology for derivation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from human patients and animal models has opened up new pathways to the better understanding of many human diseases, and has created new opportunities for therapeutic approaches. Here, we consider one important neurological disease, Parkinson's, the development of relevant neural cell lines for studying this disease, and the animal models that are available for testing the survival and function of the cells, following transplantation into the central nervous system. Rapid progress has been made recently in the application of protocols for neuroectoderm differentiation and neural patterning of pluripotent stem cells. These developments have resulted in the ability to produce large numbers of dopaminergic neurons with midbrain characteristics for further study. These cells have been shown to be functional in both rodent and nonhuman primate (NHP) models of Parkinson's disease. Patient-specific iPS cells and derived dopaminergic neurons have been developed, in particular from patients with genetic causes of Parkinson's disease. For complete modeling of the disease, it is proposed that the introduction of genetic changes into NHP iPS cells, followed by studying the phenotype of the genetic change in cells transplanted into the NHP as host animal, will yield new insights into disease processes not possible with rodent models alone.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
China 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 44 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,433,619
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#50
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,557
of 207,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them