↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Correlates of menstrual cycle characteristics among nulliparous Danish women

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Correlates of menstrual cycle characteristics among nulliparous Danish women
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/clep.s46712
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen A Hahn, Lauren A Wise, Anders H Riis, Ellen M Mikkelsen, Kenneth J Rothman, Kristen Banholzer, Elizabeth E Hatch

Abstract

We examined the association between lifestyle factors and menstrual cycle characteristics among nulliparous Danish women aged 18-40 years who were participating in an Internet-based prospective cohort study of pregnancy planners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,558,226
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#324
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,103
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.