↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Impact of denosumab on bone mass in cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Impact of denosumab on bone mass in cancer patients
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s30330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Alison T Stopeck

Abstract

Cancer therapy-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is a form of secondary osteoporosis associated with systemic chemotherapy and hormonal ablation therapy. The monitoring and treatment of CTIBL is an important component of comprehensive cancer care, especially for patients with curable disease and long life expectancies. Whereas oral bisphosphonates remain the most commonly used therapeutic option for CTIBL, additional treatment options may be required for patients who do not respond adequately or are intolerant to bisphosphonates, have renal insufficiency, or are receiving treatment with nephrotoxic medications. For these patients, denosumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative. Several recent randomized trials have examined the use of denosumab as treatment for CTIBL associated with hormone ablation therapy for breast and prostate cancer. Recent data suggest a possible role for RANKL inhibitors in both chemoprevention and the prevention of cancer recurrence through direct effects on breast tissue and breast cancer stem cells. The outcomes of several international Phase III clinical trials currently underway will help clarify the role of denosumab in patients undergoing cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#134
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,281
of 207,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.