↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Current perspectives on tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Current perspectives on tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a review
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s41433
Pubmed ID
Authors

Israa Al-Shakarchi, Nicola J Gullick, David L Scott

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a major clinical problem with many patients having continuing systemic inflammatory disease resulting in progressive erosive damage and high levels of disability. A range of pro-inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 are involved in RA pathogenesis; these cytokines can be specifically inhibited by biological agents. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a recombinant humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, administered monthly by intravenous infusion that prevents IL-6 signal transduction. There is strong evidence that it is both clinically efficacious and cost-effective. There have been several key clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of TCZ in RA patients. We review five Phase II trials and seven Phase III trials enrolling a total of 626 and 5268 RA patients respectively. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria were used as the primary or secondary outcome measure in all trials. Overall these trials demonstrated that TCZ was effective in the treatment of RA in a number of patient groups, including those with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) or TNF inhibition. TCZ use, both as monotherapy and in combination with MTX, improved the signs and symptoms of RA within several weeks of commencing treatment. Additionally, TCZ was shown to reduce radiological disease progression and improve physical function, both as monotherapy and in combination with MTX. A 5-year extension study demonstrated that TCZ sustained good long-term efficacy and safety profiles. TCZ was generally well tolerated. Although its use increased the risk of an adverse event, these were usually mild to moderate in severity and treatment did not increase the risk of a serious adverse event in comparison to controls. Due to moderate increases in serum levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins and serum transaminases seen in those patients treated with TCZ, as well as severe neutropenia in some, regular blood monitoring of full blood count, liver function and lipids is recommended. Given its clinical efficacy in the treatment of RA, TCZ may be beneficial in the treatment of other autoimmune diseases where IL-6 plays a role in the inflammatory cascade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,812,358
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#296
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,446
of 207,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.