| Title |
Promotion of peripheral nerve regeneration of a peptide compound hydrogel scaffold
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s43681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guo-Jun Wei, Meng Yao, Yan-Song Wang, Chang-Wei Zhou, De-Yu Wan, Peng-Zhen Lei, Jian Wen, Hong-Wei Lei, Da-Ming Dong |
| Abstract |
Peripheral nerve injury is a common trauma, but presents a significant challenge to the clinic. Silk-based materials have recently become an important biomaterial for tissue engineering applications due to silk's biocompatibility and impressive mechanical and degradative properties. In the present study, a silk fibroin peptide (SF16) was designed and used as a component of the hydrogel scaffold for the repair of peripheral nerve injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,278,043
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#775
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,251
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#27
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.