| Title |
Adherence to antidepressant medications: an evaluation of community pharmacists' counseling practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s48486 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Wen Chong, Parisa Aslani, Timothy F Chen |
| Abstract |
Recent studies have shown that pharmacists have a role in addressing antidepressant nonadherence. However, few studies have explored community pharmacists' actual counseling practices in response to antidepressant adherence-related issues at various phases of treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate counseling practices of community pharmacists in response to antidepressant adherence-related issues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 24% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,019,448
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#151
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,039
of 210,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.