↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Two-year clinical outcomes after coronary drug-eluting stent placement in Chinese men and women: a multicenter, prospective registry study

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Two-year clinical outcomes after coronary drug-eluting stent placement in Chinese men and women: a multicenter, prospective registry study
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s45073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajiv Shrestha, Sandeep Gami, Jing Xu, Du-Jiang Xie, Zhi-Zhong Liu, Tian Xu, Fei Ye, Shi-Qing Din, Xue-Song Qian, Song Yang, Yue-Qiang Liu, Feng Li, Ai-Ping Zhang, Shao-Liang Chen

Abstract

Previous studies have reported a discrepancy in baseline characteristics and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention between men and women. However, this finding has never been verified in the Chinese population. The present study analyzed two-year clinical outcomes after placement of coronary drug-eluting stents in Chinese men and women.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,649,940
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,070
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,292
of 207,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#27
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.