↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Influence of methylphenidate treatment assumptions on cognitive function in healthy young adults in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Influence of methylphenidate treatment assumptions on cognitive function in healthy young adults in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s47526
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Luc Mommaerts, Gerlinde Beerens, Lieve Van den Block, Eric Soetens, Sandrina Schol, Erwin Van De Vijver, Dirk Devroey

Abstract

Increasing numbers of students use stimulants such as methylphenidate (MPH) to improve their study capacity, making them prone to subsequent prolonged drug abuse. This study explored the cognitive effects of MPH in students who either assumed they received MPH or assumed they received a placebo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 24%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Psychology 14 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 28 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,210,764
of 26,519,936 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#236
of 817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,386
of 212,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,519,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.