↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Female pattern alopecia: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 867)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
9 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Female pattern alopecia: current perspectives
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s49337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren L Levy, Jason J Emer

Abstract

Hair loss is a commonly encountered problem in clinical practice, with men presenting with a distinctive pattern involving hairline recession and vertex balding (Norwood-Hamilton classification) and women exhibiting diffuse hair thinning over the crown (increased part width) and sparing of the frontal hairline (Ludwig classification). Female pattern hair loss has a strikingly overwhelming psychological effect; thus, successful treatments are necessary. Difficulty lies in successful treatment interventions, as only two medications - minoxidil and finasteride - are approved for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia, and these medications offer mediocre results, lack of a permanent cure, and potential complications. Hair transplantation is the only current successful permanent option, and it requires surgical procedures. Several other medical options, such as antiandrogens (eg, spironolactone, oral contraceptives, cyproterone, flutamide, dutasteride), prostaglandin analogs (eg, bimatoprost, latanoprost), and ketoconazole are reported to be beneficial. Laser and light therapies have also become popular despite the lack of a profound benefit. Management of expectations is crucial, and the aim of therapy, given the current therapeutic options, is to slow or stop disease progression with contentment despite patient expectations of permanent hair regrowth. This article reviews current perspectives on therapeutic options for female pattern hair loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 16 9%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#500,090
of 25,164,268 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#34
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,625
of 204,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,164,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.