↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A clinical review of recent findings in the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
Title
A clinical review of recent findings in the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/clep.s33961
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis Ponder, Millie D Long

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are disorders of chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract marked by episodes of relapse and remission. Over the past several decades, advances have been made in understanding the epidemiology of IBD. The incidence and prevalence of both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have been increasing worldwide across pediatric and adult populations. As IBD is thought to be related to a combination of individual genetic susceptibility, environmental triggers, and alterations in the gut microbiome that stimulate an inflammatory response, understanding the potentially modifiable environmental risk factors associated with the development or the course of IBD could impact disease rates or management in the future. Current hypotheses as to the development of IBD are reviewed, as are a host of environmental cofactors that have been investigated as both protective and inciting factors for IBD onset. Such environmental factors include breast feeding, gastrointestinal infections, urban versus rural lifestyle, medication exposures, stress, smoking, and diet. The role of these factors in disease course is also reviewed. Looking forward, there is still much to be learned about the etiology of IBD and how specific environmental exposures intimately impact the development of disease and also the potential for relapse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 361 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 17%
Student > Bachelor 51 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 13%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 74 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 4%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 86 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,302,500
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#236
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,170
of 207,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.