| Title |
Early enteral nutrition in critical illness: a full economic analysis using US costs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s50722 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gordon S Doig, Hélène Chevrou-Séverac, Fiona Simpson |
| Abstract |
Although published meta-analyses demonstrate patient survival may be improved if enteral nutrition (EN) is provided to critically ill patients within 24 hours of injury or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), these publications did not investigate the impact of early EN on measures of health care resource consumption and total costs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,397,545
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#114
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,595
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.