↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Decreased bacterial growth on titanium nanoscale topographies created by ion beam assisted evaporation

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 4,122)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
54 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Decreased bacterial growth on titanium nanoscale topographies created by ion beam assisted evaporation
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s119750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Stolzoff, Jason E Burns, Arash Aslani, Eric J Tobin, Congtin Nguyen, Nicholas De La Torre, Negar H Golshan, Katherine S Ziemer, Thomas J Webster

Abstract

Titanium is one of the most widely used materials for orthopedic implants, yet it has exhibited significant complications in the short and long term, largely resulting from poor cell-material interactions. Among these many modes of failure, bacterial infection at the site of implantation has become a greater concern with the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Nanostructured surfaces have been found to prevent bacterial colonization on many surfaces, including nanotextured titanium. In many cases, specific nanoscale roughness values and resulting surface energies have been considered to be "bactericidal"; here, we explore the use of ion beam evaporation as a novel technique to create nanoscale topographical features that can reduce bacterial density. Specifically, we investigated the relationship between the roughness and titanium nanofeature shapes and sizes, in which smaller, more regularly spaced nanofeatures (specifically 40-50 nm tall peaks spaced ~0.25 μm apart) were found to have more effect than surfaces with high roughness values alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Materials Science 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 430. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#66,417
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#4
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,623
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.