↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Legislative activity related to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in the United States (2006–2015): a need for evidence-based policy

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Legislative activity related to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in the United States (2006–2015): a need for evidence-based policy
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s128247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Keim-Malpass, Emma M Mitchell, Pamela B DeGuzman, Mark H Stoler, Christine Kennedy

Abstract

State-based policies to mandate HPV vaccination are politically challenging and have received broad criticisms. There is a critical need to understand the legislative activities that underpin subsequent policy implementation. The objective of this policy analysis was to analyze state legislation that focused on HPV vaccination from 2006-2015. A content analysis was conducted among primary sources of legislative data from HPV vaccine-related bills, including using the National Conference of State Legislatures as a search-source. Findings reveal that much of the legislative activity occurred early after the HPV vaccination was introduced, and focused on increased information for parents, public financing, awareness campaigns, etc. Far fewer states focused on voluntary or mandatory vaccination. Understanding the barriers to achieving mandatory vaccination policy and implementation of such policies for HPV vaccines remains a public health priority.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Social Sciences 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,690,523
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#119
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,888
of 317,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.