| Title |
Women’s well-being improves after missed miscarriage with more active support and application of Swanson’s Caring Theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/prbm.s15431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annsofie Adolfsson |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to provide better organization and more efficient use of resources within the health care system in order to identify women with nonviable pregnancy earlier in their gestation terms and also to identify those women who experience severe grief reaction after the miscarriage. The proposed solution is to offer an appointment with a gynecologist during regular office hours after consultation with the patient's midwife to women experiencing symptoms and who are concerned with the viability of their pregnancy. Unnecessary contact with the emergency room by the patients would be reduced as a result of this improvement in organization. The aim of the study was to give the women experiencing missed miscarriage an increased sense of well-being by applying Swanson's Caring Theory to their recovery, in addition to the better organization and more efficient use of resources. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,200,843
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#506
of 542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,955
of 180,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.