↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Glycophenotype of breast and prostate cancer stem cells treated with thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer compound

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Glycophenotype of breast and prostate cancer stem cells treated with thieno[2,3-b]pyridine anticancer compound
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s121122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Mastelić, Vedrana Čikeš Čulić, Nikolina Režić Mužinić, Milena Vuica-Ross, David Barker, Euphemia Y Leung, Jóhannes Reynisson, Anita Markotić

Abstract

Tumor progression may be driven by a small subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSCs characterized by CD44(+)/CD24(-) phenotype). We investigated the influence of a newly developed thienopyridine anticancer compound (3-amino-5-oxo-N-naphthyl-5,6,7, 8-tetrahydrothieno[2,3-b]quinoline-2-carboxamide, 1) on the growth, survival and glycophenotype (CD15s and GM3 containing neuraminic acid substituted with acetyl residue, NeuAc) of breast and prostate cancer stem/progenitor-like cell population. MDA-MB-231 and Du-145 cells were incubated with compound 1 alone or in combination with paclitaxel. The cellular metabolic activity was determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The type of cell death induced by 48-h treatment was assessed using a combination of Annexin-V-FITC and propidium iodide staining. Flow cytometric analysis was performed to detect the percentage of CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells, and GM3 and CD15s positive CSCs, as well as the expression of GM3 and CD15s per one CSC, in both cell lines. Compound 1 produces a dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity, mediated mainly by apoptosis in breast cancer cells, and slightly (2.3%) but statistically significant lowering breast CSC subpopulation. GM3 expression per one breast CSC was increased, and the percentage of prostate GM3(+) CSC subpopulation was decreased in cells treated with compound 1 compared with non-treated cells. The percentage of CD15s(+) CSCs was lower in both cell lines after treatment with compound 1. Considering that triple-negative breast cancers are characterized by an increased percentage of breast CSCs and knowing their association with an increased risk of metastasis and mortality, compound 1 is a potentially effective drug for triple-negative breast cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Chemistry 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#925
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,388
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#26
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.