↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evaluating the patient experience after implantation of a 0.4 mg sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (DextenzaTM): results of a qualitative survey

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 1,757)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the patient experience after implantation of a 0.4 mg sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (DextenzaTM): results of a qualitative survey
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s126283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph P Gira, Reginald Sampson, Steven M Silverstein, Thomas R Walters, Jamie Lynne Metzinger, Jonathan H Talamo

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient experience of sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™) following cataract surgery as part of a Phase III clinical trial program. This cross-sectional, qualitative evaluation involved individual interviews lasting approximately 45 minutes. Patients from four US investigational study sites who had previously received an insert were enrolled. There were no predesignated end points; this was a qualitative survey seeking a deeper understanding of patient experience. Twenty-five patients were interviewed. Most patients (92%) reported the highest level of satisfaction grade with regard to overall product satisfaction. All patients described the insert as comfortable. Most patients (96%) described their overall experience with the insert as very convenient or extremely convenient. Twenty-two of 23 (96%) participants rated their experience with the insert as "very" or "extremely convenient", compared to previous topical therapy, and 88% of patients stated that if they were to undergo cataract surgery again, they would request the insert. When asked if they would recommend the insert to family members or friends, 92% stated they would. The survey found that 84% of participants would be willing to pay more for the insert than for eye drop therapy. The dexamethasone insert was found by patients to be highly favorable with regard to overall satisfaction, convenience, and comfort. The insert was well received and largely preferred over topical therapy alternatives following surgery. More extensive evaluation of the patient experience is warranted, and future studies should help inform design of the next generation of sustained release drug delivery systems.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#763,174
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#33
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,919
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.