↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Osteopathy for primary headache patients: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Osteopathy for primary headache patients: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s130501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Cerritelli, Eleonora Lacorte, Nuria Ruffini, Nicola Vanacore

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy, effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in patients with headache. Migraine is one of the most common and disabling medical conditions. It affects more than 15% of the general population, causing high global socioeconomic costs, and the currently available treatment options are inadequate. We systematically reviewed all available studies investigating the use of OMT in patients with migraine and other forms of headache. The search of literature produced six studies, five of which were eligible for review. The reviewed papers collectively support the notion that patients with migraine can benefit from OMT. OMT could most likely reduce the number of episodes per month as well as drug use. None of the included studies, however, was classified as low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. The results from this systematic review show a preliminary low level of evidence that OMT is effective in the management of headache. However, studies with more rigorous designs and methodology are needed to strengthen this evidence. Moreover, this review suggests that new manual interventions for the treatment of acute migraine are available and developing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 256 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 43 17%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Researcher 17 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 78 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 90 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,248,821
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#146
of 1,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,907
of 324,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#7
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.