Title |
Assessing the relationship between the level of pain control and patient satisfaction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s42262 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shay Phillips, Maja Gift, Shyam Gelot, Minh Duong, Hazel Tapp |
Abstract |
The primary assessment tool used by hospitals to measure the outcomes of pain management programs is the 0-10 numerical pain rating scale. However, it is unclear if this assessment should be used as the sole indicator of positive outcomes by pain management programs. Although it is assumed that pain intensity scores would be correlated with patient satisfaction, few studies have evaluated the association between pain intensity scores and patient satisfaction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Peru | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 23% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,759,434
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#320
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,504
of 212,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.