| Title |
Evaluation of nepafenac in prevention of macular edema following cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s31902 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rishi Singh, Louis Alpern, Glenn J Jaffe, Robert P Lehmann, John Lim, Harvey J Reiser, Kenneth Sall, Thomas Walters, Dana Sager |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 49% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#796
of 3,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,653
of 182,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.