The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Biomechanical evaluation and surface characterization of a nano-modified surface on PEEK implants: a study in the rabbit tibia
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s60387 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pär Johansson, Ryo Jimbo, Per Kjellin, Fredrik Currie, Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic, Ann Wennerberg |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 24% |
Engineering | 16 | 17% |
Materials Science | 10 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,828
of 240,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#28
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.