| Title |
Ultra-pure, water-dispersed Au nanoparticles produced by femtosecond laser ablation and fragmentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s44163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reda Kubiliūtė, Ksenia A Maximova, Alireza Lajevardipour, Jiawey Yong, Jennifer S Hartley, Abu SM Mohsin, Pierre Blandin, James WM Chon, Marc Sentis, Paul R Stoddart, Andrei Kabashin, Ričardas Rotomskis, Andrew HA Clayton, Saulius Juodkazis |
| Abstract |
Aqueous solutions of ultra-pure gold nanoparticles have been prepared by methods of femtosecond laser ablation from a solid target and fragmentation from already formed colloids. Despite the absence of protecting ligands, the solutions could be (1) fairly stable and poly size-dispersed; or (2) very stable and monodispersed, for the two fabrication modalities, respectively. Fluorescence quenching behavior and its intricacies were revealed by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in rhodamine 6G water solution. We show that surface-enhanced Raman scattering of rhodamine 6G on gold nanoparticles can be detected with high fidelity down to micromolar concentrations using the nanoparticles. Application potential of pure gold nanoparticles with polydispersed and nearly monodispersed size distributions are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 28% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 20% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,886
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,002
of 206,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#48
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.