| Title |
A framework for grouping nanoparticles based on their measurable characteristics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s40521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christie M Sayes, P Alex Smith, Ivan V Ivanov |
| Abstract |
There is a need to take a broader look at nanotoxicological studies. Eventually, the field will demand that some generalizations be made. To begin to address this issue, we posed a question: are metal colloids on the nanometer-size scale a homogeneous group? In general, most people can agree that the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials can be linked and related to their induced toxicological responses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,087
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,583
of 212,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#64
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.