| Title |
Effect of pill burden on dosing preferences, willingness to pay, and likely adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s43465 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A Brett Hauber, Steven Han, Jui-Chen Yang, Ira Gantz, Kaan Tunceli, Juan Marcos Gonzalez, Kimberly Brodovicz, Charles M Alexander, Michael Davies, Kristy Iglay, Qiaoyi Zhang, Larry Radican |
| Abstract |
To quantify willingness-to-pay (WTP) for reducing pill burden and dosing frequency among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to examine the effect of dosing frequency and pill burden on likely medication adherence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 26% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2013.
All research outputs
#17,351,840
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,067
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,366
of 212,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.