| Title |
Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s44208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brett E Thomes, Thomas A Callaghan |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the impact of continuous manufacturing process improvements on glistening formation in AcrySof hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) by comparing lenses manufactured in 2003 with lenses manufactured in 2012. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 39% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,731,975
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,035
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,102
of 207,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#21
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.