↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Emerging targets in pancreatic cancer: epithelial–mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Emerging targets in pancreatic cancer: epithelial–mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/ott.s34670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason A Castellanos, Nipun B Merchant, Nagaraj S Nagathihalli

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive solid malignancies and is characterized by poor response to current therapy and a dismal survival rate. Recent insights regarding the role of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in tumorigenesis have brought further understanding to the field and have highlighted new therapeutic targets. CSCs are a distinct subset of cancer cells, with the ability to differentiate into other cell types and self-renew in order to fuel the maintenance of tumor amplification. Transition of a cancer cell from an EMT leads to increased migratory and invasive properties, and thus facilitates initiation of metastasis. EMT is regulated by a complex network of factors that includes cytokines, growth factors, aberrant signaling pathways, transcription factors, and the tumor microenvironment. There is emerging evidence that the EMT process may give rise to CSCs, or at least cells with stem cell-like properties. We review the key pathways involved in both of these processes, the biomarkers used to identify CSCs, and new therapeutic approaches targeting CSCs and EMT in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Chemistry 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,597
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,175
of 212,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.