↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Safety and effectiveness of a glistening-free single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (enVista)

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Safety and effectiveness of a glistening-free single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (enVista)
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s50499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Packer, Luther Fry, Kevin T Lavery, Robert Lehmann, James McDonald, Louis Nichamin, Brian Bearie, Jon Hayashida, Griffith E Altmann, Omid Khodai

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL; enVista model MX60; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA) when used to correct aphakia following cataract extraction in adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 23%
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,344
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,070
of 212,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#29
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.