↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Medical and surgical ward rounds in teaching hospitals of Kuwait University: students’ perceptions

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Medical Education and Practice, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Medical and surgical ward rounds in teaching hospitals of Kuwait University: students’ perceptions
Published in
Advances in Medical Education and Practice, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/amep.s52096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara AlMutar, Lulwa AlTourah, Hussain Sadeq, Jumanah Karim, Yousef Marwan

Abstract

Teaching sessions for medical students during ward rounds are an essential component of bedside teaching, providing students with the opportunity to regard patients as actual people, and to observe their physical conditions directly, allowing a better understanding of illnesses to be developed. We aim to explore medical students' perceptions regarding medical and surgical ward rounds within the Faculty of Medicine at Kuwait University, and to evaluate whether this teaching activity is meeting the expectation of learners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 22%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 61%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#17,562,823
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,602
of 213,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them