↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: patient selection and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: patient selection and perspectives
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s113507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paige K Kuhlmann, Kenneth J DeLay, James Anaissie, Wayne JG Hellstrom, Faysal A Yafi

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of the use of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie's disease has been confirmed over the past several years. However, identification of the ideal patient population for use of this treatment is not well established. Multiple studies have attempted to delineate various patient-specific factors that may predict response to treatment with CCH, with the intent of enhancing patient selection. To date, these include baseline curvature severity, duration of disease, disease phase at presentation, plaque calcification, baseline erectile function, plaque size, age, comorbid diabetes, previous penile trauma, responsiveness to first treatment cycle, baseline penile shortening or pain, prior treatment with intralesional injection, compliance with plaque modeling, and atypical curvature. In addition, other studies have sought to explore various aspects of treatment with CCH that may affect patient perspective of treatment. They have focused on patient-reported outcomes, female partner considerations, cost of treatment, and potential confounders of patient satisfaction. This review provides a summary and analysis of currently available literature on topics of patient selection and perspectives in regard to treatment of Peyronie's disease with CCH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,824,878
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,400
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,129
of 324,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#48
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.