↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Knowledge of adverse drug reaction reporting in first year postgraduate doctors in a medical college

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Knowledge of adverse drug reaction reporting in first year postgraduate doctors in a medical college
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s31482
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prerna Upadhyaya, Vikas Seth, Vijay V Moghe, Monika Sharma, Mushtaq Ahmed

Abstract

Poor reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by doctors is a major hindrance to successful pharmacovigilance. The present study was designed to assess first-year residents' knowledge of ADR reporting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2012.
All research outputs
#5,326,832
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#264
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,201
of 179,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.