Title |
Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency during the summer and its relationship with sun exposure and skin phototype in elderly men living in the tropics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s47058 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcelo Azevedo Cabral, Carla Núbia Borges, Juliana Maria Coelho Maia, Caio Augusto Martins Aires, Francisco Bandeira |
Abstract |
The aim of the study reported here was to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among elderly men and its association with sun exposure and skin phototypes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Peru | 1 | 1% |
Qatar | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 67 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,051
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,991
of 219,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#23
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.