↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Value as the key concept in the health care system: how it has influenced medical practice and clinical decision-making processes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Value as the key concept in the health care system: how it has influenced medical practice and clinical decision-making processes
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s122383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Marzorati, Gabriella Pravettoni

Abstract

In the last 10 years, value has played a key role in the health care system. In this concept, innovations in medical practice and the increasing importance of patient centeredness have contributed to draw the attention of the medical community. Nonetheless, a large consensus on the meaning of "value" is still lacking: patients, physicians, policy makers, and other health care professionals have different ideas on which component of value may play a prominent role. Yet, shared clinical decision-making and patient empowerment have been recognized as fundamental features of the concept of value. Different paradigms of health care system embrace different meanings of value, and the absence of common and widely accepted definition does not help to identify a unique model of care in health care system. Our aim is to provide an overview of those paradigms that have considered value as a key theoretical concept and to investigate how the presence of value can influence the medical practice. This article may contribute to draw attention toward patients and propose a possible link between health care system based on "value" and new paradigms such as patient-centered system (PCS), patient empowerment, and P5 medicine, in order to create a predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory, and psycho-cognitive model to treat patients. Indeed, patient empowerment, value-based system, and P5 medicine seem to shed light on different aspects of a PCS, and this allows a better understanding of people under care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 15 7%
Other 14 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 72 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 6%
Psychology 11 5%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 80 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,315,170
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#179
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,118
of 325,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.