| Title |
Whole-body electromyostimulation as a means to impact muscle mass and abdominal body fat in lean, sedentary, older female adults: subanalysis of the TEST-III trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s52337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang Kemmler, Simon von Stengel |
| Abstract |
The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of 12 months of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) exercise on appendicular muscle mass and abdominal fat mass in subjects specifically at risk for sarcopenia and abdominal obesity, but unable or unwilling to exercise conventionally. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 91 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 58 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 106 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,017,683
of 25,504,429 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#219
of 1,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,002
of 220,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,504,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.