↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Illness denial questionnaire for patients and caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Illness denial questionnaire for patients and caregivers
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s128622
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Rossi Ferrario, Ines Giorgi, Paola Baiardi, Laura Giuntoli, Gianluigi Balestroni, Paola Cerutti, Marina Manera, Paola Gabanelli, Valentina Solara, Roberta Fornara, Michela Luisetti, Pierangela Omarini, Giovanna Omarini, Giulio Vidotto

Abstract

Interest in assessing denial is still present, despite the criticisms concerning its definition and measurement. We tried to develop a questionnaire (Illness Denial Questionnaire, IDQ) assessing patients' and caregivers' denial in relation to their illness/disturbance. After a preliminary study, a final version of 24 dichotomous items (true/false) was selected. We hypothesized a theoretical model with three dimensions: denial of negative emotions, resistance to change, and conscious avoidance, the first two composing the actual Denial and the last representing an independent component of the illness denial behavior. The IDQ was administered to 400 subjects (219 patients and 181 caregivers) together with the Anxiety-Depression Questionnaire - Reduced form (AD-R), in order to assess concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency indices (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω), and test-retest analysis were performed. CFA and internal consistency indices (Cronbach's α: 0.87-0.96) indicated a clear and meaningful three-factor structure of IDQ, for both patients and caregivers. Further analyses showed good concurrent validity, with Denial and its subscale negatively associated with anxiety and depression and avoidance positively associated with anxiety and depression. The IDQ also showed a good stability (r from 0.71 to 0.87). The IDQ demonstrated good psychometric properties. Denial of negative emotions and resistance to change seem to contribute to a real expression of denial, and conscious avoidance seems to constitute a further step in the process of cognitive-affective elaboration of the illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Other 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,171
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,657
of 324,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#57
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.