↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

SOSPES: SPIRIVA® observational study measuring SGRQ score in routine medical practice in Central and Eastern Europe

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
SOSPES: SPIRIVA® observational study measuring SGRQ score in routine medical practice in Central and Eastern Europe
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/copd.s45640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matjaž Fležar, Karina Jahnz-Różyk, Gloria Enache, Tatiana Martynenko, Peter Kristufek, Sanda Škrinjarić-Cincar, Pavla Kadlecová, Goran Martinovic

Abstract

The long-acting inhaled anticholinergic agent, tiotropium, is recommended as first-line maintenance therapy for moderate to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance, health status, and to reduce exacerbations. Few studies have evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of tiotropium in patients in routine clinical conditions. The current study was designed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of tiotropium delivered via the HandiHaler® device on the health status of patients with COPD with Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) disease classification 2-4 in six central and eastern European countries in a real-life clinical setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,613
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,241
of 219,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.