↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Positive predictive values of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes for dermatologic events and hypersensitivity leading to hospitalization or emergency room visit among women…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Positive predictive values of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes for dermatologic events and hypersensitivity leading to hospitalization or emergency room visit among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in the Danish and Swedish national patient registries
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/clep.s126370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kasper Adelborg, Lotte Brix Christensen, Troels Munch, Johnny Kahlert, Ylva Trolle Lagerros, Grethe S Tell, Ellen M Apalset, Fei Xue, Vera Ehrenstein

Abstract

Clinical epidemiology research studies, including pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance studies, use routinely collected health data, such as diagnoses recorded in national health and administrative registries, to assess clinical effectiveness and safety of treatments. We estimated positive predictive values (PPVs) of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes for primary diagnoses of dermatologic events and hypersensitivity recorded at hospitalization or emergency room visit in the national patient registries of Denmark and Sweden among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). This validation study included women with PMO identified from the Danish and Swedish national patient registries (2005-2014). Medical charts of the potential cases served as the gold standard for the diagnosis confirmation and were reviewed and adjudicated by physicians. We obtained and reviewed 189 of 221 sampled medical records (86%). The overall PPV was 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.1%-96.3%) for dermatologic events, while the PPVs for bullous events and erythematous dermatologic events were 52.5% (95% CI, 37.5%-67.1%) and 12.5% (95% CI, 2.2%-47.1%), respectively. The PPV was 59.0% (95% CI, 48.3%-69.0%) for hypersensitivity; however, the PPV of hypersensitivity increased to 100.0% (95% CI, 67.6%-100.0%) when restricting to diagnostic codes for anaphylaxis. The overall results did not vary by country. Among women with PMO, the PPV for any dermatologic event recorded as the primary diagnosis at hospitalization or at an emergency room visit was high and acceptable for epidemiologic research in the Danish and Swedish national patient registries. The PPV was substantially lower for hypersensitivity leading to hospitalization or emergency room visit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,451,618
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#479
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,728
of 311,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.