↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Obstructive sleep apnea in children: a critical update

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
Title
Obstructive sleep apnea in children: a critical update
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/nss.s51907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui-Leng Tan, David Gozal, Leila Kheirandish-Gozal

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children is a highly prevalent disorder caused by a conglomeration of complex pathophysiological processes, leading to recurrent upper airway dysfunction during sleep. The clinical relevance of OSA resides in its association with significant morbidities that affect the cardiovascular, neurocognitive, and metabolic systems. The American Academy of Pediatrics recently reiterated its recommendations that children with symptoms and signs suggestive of OSA should be investigated with polysomnography (PSG), and treated accordingly. However, treatment decisions should not only be guided by PSG results, but should also integrate the magnitude of symptoms and the presence or absence of risk factors and signs of OSA morbidity. The first-line therapy in children with adenotonsillar hypertrophy is adenotonsillectomy, although there is increasing evidence that medical therapy, in the form of intranasal steroids or montelukast, may be considered in mild OSA. In this review, we delineate the major concepts regarding the pathophysiology of OSA, its morbidity, diagnosis, and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 273 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Student > Master 27 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 23 8%
Other 75 27%
Unknown 75 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Neuroscience 4 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 90 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,187,812
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#253
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,848
of 213,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.