↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of water-based exercise on bone health of middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Effects of water-based exercise on bone health of middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s129182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vini Simas, Wayne Hing, Rodney Pope, Mike Climstein

Abstract

Age-related bone loss is a major health concern. Only exercises associated with high-impact and mechanical loading have been linked to a positive effect on bone turnover; however, these types of exercises may not always be appropriate for middle-aged and older adults due to physical decline or chronic disorders such as osteoarthritis. Water-based exercise (WBE) has been shown to affect different components of physical fitness, has lower risks of traumatic fracture, and applies less stress to joints. However, the effects of WBE on bone health are unclear. This study aimed to explore whether WBE is effective in preventing age-related bone deterioration in middle-aged and older adults. A search of relevant databases and the references of identified studies was performed. Critical narrative synthesis and meta-analyses were conducted. Eleven studies, involving 629 participants, met all inclusion criteria. All participants were postmenopausal women. Eight studies compared WBE to a sedentary control group, and four studies had land-based exercise (LBE) participants as a comparison group. Meta-analyses revealed significant differences between WBE and control group in favor of WBE for changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (mean difference [MD] 0.03 g/cm(2); 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01 to 0.05) and femoral neck (MD 0.04 g/cm(2); 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.07). Significant differences were also revealed between WBE and LBE in favor of LBE for changes in lumbar spine BMD (MD -0.04 g/cm(2); 95% CI: -0.06 to -0.02). However, there was no significant difference between WBE and LBE for changes in femoral neck BMD (MD -0.03 g/cm(2); 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.01). WBE may have benefits with respect to maintaining or improving bone health in postmenopausal women but less benefit when compared to LBE. Further research is required on this topic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 67 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 29 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 73 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,355,482
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#30
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,592
of 324,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them