↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Current strategies to minimize the bleeding risk of warfarin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Current strategies to minimize the bleeding risk of warfarin
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s41404
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Snipelisky, Fred Kusumoto

Abstract

For many decades, the vitamin K antagonist warfarin has been the mainstay of treatment for various conditions that require anticoagulation, including atrial fibrillation. Although the efficacy of warfarin in both prevention and treatment of thrombosis has been demonstrated in numerous randomized clinical studies, one of the major concerns that remains is the risk of bleeding. Although the net benefit of warfarin has been demonstrated in large clinical trials, physicians and patients alike are often reluctant to use warfarin because of the bleeding risk. Bleeding in patients on warfarin is generally minor requiring no intervention, but the development of a major bleeding complication is associated with significant morbidity and can even be fatal. Numerous risk factors that increase the probability of having a hemorrhage while on warfarin have been identified, and bleeding risk scores have been developed. Various strategies to reduce bleeding risks have been developed and have become more important, since the use of warfarin and other anticoagulants continues to increase. This paper provides a concise review of bleeding risk factors, while outlining recommendations both physician and patients can incorporate to help reduce the risk of bleeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 58%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#229
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,283
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.