↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Estimation of the depth of the thoracic epidural space in children using magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Estimation of the depth of the thoracic epidural space in children using magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s124123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tariq M Wani, Mahmood Rafiq, Arif Nazir, Hatem A Azzam, Usama Al Zuraigi, Joseph D Tobias

Abstract

The estimation of the distance from the skin to the thoracic epidural space or skin to epidural depth (SED) may increase the success rate and decrease the incidence of complications during placement of a thoracic epidural catheter. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most comprehensive imaging modality of the spine, allowing for the accurate determination of tissue spaces and distances. The present study uses MRI-derived measurements to measure the SED and define the ratio between the straight and inclined SEDs at two thoracic levels (T6-7 and T9-10) in children. The T2-weighed sagittal MRI images of 109 children, ranging in age from 1 month to 8 years, undergoing radiological evaluation unrelated to spine pathology were assessed. The SEDs (inclined and straight) were determined, and a comparison between the SEDs at two thoracic levels (T6-7 and T9-10) was made. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to assess the relationship of the inclined thoracic T6-7 and T9-10 SED measurements with age, height, and weight. Body weight demonstrated a stronger association with the SED than did the age or height with R(2) values of 0.6 for T6-7 and 0.5 for T9-10. The formulae describing the relationship between the weight and the inclined SED were T6-7 inclined (mm) = 7 + 0.9 × kg and T9-10 inclined (mm) = 7 + 0.8 × kg. The depth of the pediatric thoracic epidural space shows a stronger correlation with weight than with age or height. Based on the MRI data, the predictive weight-based formulas can serve as guide to clinicians for placement of thoracic epidural catheters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,523
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,657
of 324,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#46
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.