↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared to the concurrent administration of its monocomponents indacaterol and glycopyrronium: the BEACON study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared to the concurrent administration of its monocomponents indacaterol and glycopyrronium: the BEACON study
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/copd.s49615
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald Dahl, Dalal Jadayel, Vijay KT Alagappan, Hungta Chen, Donald Banerji

Abstract

The BEACON study evaluated the efficacy and safety of QVA149, a once-daily dual bronchodilator containing a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) indacaterol and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) glycopyrronium (NVA237), in development for the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), compared with the free-dose concurrent administration of indacaterol plus glycopyrronium (IND+GLY).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 17%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,776,017
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#125
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,973
of 219,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.