↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Validation of Health Behavior and Stages of Change Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in Breast cancer targets and therapy, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Validation of Health Behavior and Stages of Change Questionnaire
Published in
Breast cancer targets and therapy, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/bctt.s129855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leivy Patricia Gonzalez-Ramirez, Jose Maria De la Roca-Chiapas, Cecilia Colunga-Rodriguez, Maria de Lourdes Preciado-Serrano, Adrian Daneri-Navarro, Francisco Javier Pedroza-Cabrera, Reyna Jazmin Martinez-Arriaga

Abstract

The transtheoretical model (TTM) has been widely used to promote healthy behaviors in different groups. However, a questionnaire has not yet been developed to evaluate the health behaviors that medical practitioners often consider in individuals with cancer or at a high risk of developing cancer. The aim of this study was to construct and validate the Health Behavior and Stages of Change Questionnaire (HBSCQ), which is based on the TTM and health recommendations related to risk and factors that protect against cancer. Content validity was conducted in two phases (qualitative and quantitative). Item difficulty index, item discrimination index, and discrimination coefficient were obtained based on the classical test theory. Finally, Cronbach's alpha was used. Measure of concordance showed scores considered adequate and excellent. The item discrimination index obtained a rating of "excellent" and suggested the preservation of all items. The discrimination coefficient scores are >0.74. The global internal consistency of the HBSCQ was 0.384. HBSCQ specification between groups of internal consistency for the sample of men was 0.712 and that for the sample of women was 0.378. The HBSCQ represents a proposal for a fast, simple, and innovative screening test, which aims to identify persons who may benefit from interventions to promote health behaviors delimited to the stage of change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 29 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Psychology 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,239,390
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#181
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,337
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.