↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Eliminating the need for fasting with oral administration of bisphosphonates

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
59 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Eliminating the need for fasting with oral administration of bisphosphonates
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2013
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s52291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Pazianas, Bo Abrahamsen, Serge Ferrari, R Graham G Russell

Abstract

Bisphosphonates are the major treatment of choice for osteoporosis, given that they are attached preferentially by bone and significantly reduce the risk of fractures. Oral bisphosphonates are poorly absorbed (usually less than 1% for nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates) and when taken with food or beverages create complexes that cannot be absorbed. For this reason, they must be taken on an empty stomach, and a period of up to 2 hours must elapse before the consumption of any food or drink other than plain water. This routine is not only inconvenient but can lead to discontinuation of treatment, and when mistakenly taken with food, may result in misdiagnosis of resistance to or failure of treatment. The development of an enteric-coated delayed-release formulation of risedronate with the addition of the calcium chelator, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), a widely used food stabilizer, eliminates the need for fasting without affecting the bioavailability of risedronate or its efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 18 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Chemistry 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,046,566
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#346
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,583
of 219,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.