↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Concepts of comorbidities, multiple morbidities, complications, and their clinical epidemiologic analogs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Concepts of comorbidities, multiple morbidities, complications, and their clinical epidemiologic analogs
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, July 2013
DOI 10.2147/clep.s45305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Gulbech Ording, Henrik Toft Sørensen

Abstract

The proportion of older people in the world population is expected to increase rapidly during the upcoming decades. Consequently, the number of patients with multimorbidity will increase dramatically. In epidemiologic research, the concepts of multimorbidity, comorbidity, and complications have been confusing, and some of these concepts are used interchangeably. In this commentary, the authors propose a clear terminology for clinical concepts describing different aspects of multimorbidity and elucidate the relationship between these clinical concepts and their epidemiologic analogs. Depending on whether a study uses causal or predictive models, a proper distinction between concepts of multimorbidity is important. It can be very difficult to separate complications of the index disease under study from comorbidity. In this context, use of comorbidity indices as confounding scores should be done with caution. Other methodologic issues are type, duration, severity, and number of comorbidities included in the ascertainment methods, as well as sources included in the research. Studies that recognize these challenges have the potential to yield valid estimates of the comorbidity burden and results that can be compared with other studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 45 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Computer Science 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 57 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,931,229
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#267
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,101
of 194,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.